To Foreign Policy:
Please caused global thinkers
heated debate
"universal values"
To Foreign Policy:
Please caused global thinkers
heated debate
"universal values"
"China
Network Public Evaluation of officials
hundred
people group" Shi Sansheng Kyushu Comments ·
127
Translator:God has
eyes
The Centuries ago,
the great thinker Rousseau and
Voltaire, Diderot of
heated debate and generated
ill feelings. And
help us to understand the
truth: there is no
perfect idea, great thinkers
can not get rid of
the limitations of the times.
Based on this, Mr. Gu
Xiaojun "just values" has
deeply affected the
care Disciples, Gu Powder
group members, as
well as subtle many people
dare not anger nor
outspoken. But they still lack
the voice of
opposition. Shi Sansheng I feel
sorry, not against
people, but seen in the
network
"dissidents" and more general terms,
dare to refute Mr. Gu
Xiaojun thinking of
glorious, just
blindly attack Xia Sanlu. Such
"dissent",
a slight understanding of the little
people of the
mainland strict management
ideology can tell,
which was fifty cents were the
usual "thinking
of you speak to him, he speaks to
you and
sophistry" approach.
So, in addition to
fifty cents trouble. Have not
really thought people
dare to stand up and
loudly refuted Mr. Gu
Xiaojun "fair view"? Of
course not, there are
at least the selection of
"foreign
policy" previous "one hundred global
thinkers" who
was never shot. Even foreign
thinkers read
understand Mr. Gu Xiaojun "fair
view", as well
as the local Chinese thinkers. Even
the local Chinese
thinkers refused to hand, not
there "Foreign
Policy" can "emancipate the mind
the great
debate" in the name, a survival of the
fittest to do!
Way back Shi Sansheng
year has also been
located the
Recruitment Challenge Cup world
Confucius Hole Sun
and hole Confucian
descenShit on
Confucius's "destiny" concept is
the grotesque not by
the divination doctrine
"debate.
Unfortunately, until it is blocked, not
even one person can
refute Shi Sansheng
global. Detract from
one of the world's leading
media ---
"foreign policy, are not as good as Shi
Sansheng my
tolerance? Moreover, the Chinese
culture is about
"was not exposed deed goes
unpunished". If
foreign policy seriously affect
China willing to
liberal ideas of the Western
world, why not
schooling is a Shi Sansheng, to a
real confrontation of
ideas?
Seriously China, the
courage to stand up and
self-proclaimed
"big thinkers", the only one of
Mr. Gu Xiaojun ear.
The world to see: Mr. Gu
was blocked under
every possible way, his mind
is still "wild
fire, Springtime Renaissance. The
estimated global
thinkers, especially local
Chinese thinkers
early on Mr. Gu Xiaojun unique
heart Health
unforgiveness. "Foreign Policy" Why
not nationality Mr.
Gu Xiaojun introduce
ourselves to another
disciple recommend, Gu
dough recommended
when the title "public impartiality is
the first values,
Chinese thinkers shot together
to field the Rush it?
Sure enough, the natural
rights of freedom
"beat" public impartiality is the first
values. That does not
prove that the westerly
overwhelm the
Dongfeng? Foreign policy from the
sidelines, fame and
fortune, why not?
To be honest, not
even good at Habitat the Gu
disciples first
"Big Brother", "public impartiality is the first
values," Mr. Gu
Xiaojun still feel a puzzle. How
eager global foreign
policy thinkers wing,
pointing my maze!
How? Foreign policy
decision-makers, you have
no courage and
magnanimity, dare to come to
the farm, the Western
ideological polemics?
People cooking, CCTV,
huh "Sino-French Culinary
Competition. Is the
so-called thinkers, not
people cooking brave?
The mule is a horse,
he will have to pull out yo
not.
[Shi Sansheng Friday,
October 26, 2012 5:43 China]