Gu
Xiaojun swallow humiliation and bear a heavy load Obama Forsake heresy and
return to the truth
"China
Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group" Shi Sansheng
Kyushu Comments • 190
Translator:
God has eyes
In the end is the elite of the democratic
countries,
once aware of the conspiracy was
brought
to light, pretending to be blind, fool
blackmail
CPC sparked when surrounded and
attacked
by the United States itself, even the
people
of the Western countries, the calculation
of the
lawyer, President Obama finally let it
come,
and ready to give up the evil trick of the
rip-off.
Rectifies itself a remarkable achievement.
Although
the U.S. government, led by President
Obama
on human rights issues for the first time
shown
to the Chinese Communists. However, how
to
improve Sino-US strategic dialogue involving
"human
rights" issues in the new government of
Communist
China is not announced before
President
Obama unilaterally announced plans to
"meet
the CCP's human rights requirements, and
still
can not rule out the ingredients of the
conspiracy.
Because for now, China and the
United
States government is still in the dark
connivance,
to debunk the Sino-US whom
contention
decades of human rights is a hoax,
questioned
the school to impose an
unprecedented
ban troublemakers. Because the
Times
is still trying to continue to fabricate a
"stupid
story" to fool the people of China and
the
United States and around the world expect
to Ai
Weiwei pseudo rights.
Blocked from the Chinese Communist Party
Central
Propaganda Department is no doubt,
take a
look at the blog of Mr. Gu Xiaojun, to see
Shi
Sansheng the blog look at Gu dough a
member
of the blog, deleted text is barely veiled
simply
do not care about Xi Jinping, the general
secretary
vowed to uphold the constitution
dignity;
troublemakers from the U.S. government
even
more obvious, such as Google's Gu Xiaojun
","
Shi Sansheng "search records forever Posting
quantity
not only out of sync, sometimes not
decreased
rather than increased. This morning,
for
example, click on the Google chrome crash
state
can not enter more than four minutes after
the
computer is not hot start, had a hard
shutdown
restart. I remember for this is known
as the
world's most secure chrome Google
offering
a reward of one million U.S. dollars to
carry
out attacks, visible to Google's own very
confident.
In the end is who controls my
chrome?
In addition to Google, who have this
ability?
Not long ago, Google publicly report said the
U.S.
government is the government all over the
world
to Google asking the most. Google really
have
the courage to reject all of the
requirements
from the White House? I really do
not be
evil, Chen blind deleted article "sons of
the
soil --- the blind barefoot lawyer Chen
Guangcheng"
will not help. What a beautiful
article
fabricated ah! Why should like garbage
clean-up
it? Also the "sons of the soil", why not
say is
the "Son of God"? See the information that
Chen
blind father and mother of the people, ah,
how
will land old child? I know that can grow
crops
to the ground. Is it also can grow it?
Remember, is related to the issue of human
rights,
the Chinese Communist Party has always
been
razor. Every time the Americans a Blue
Book
accusations of human rights in China, the
CCP
will immediately retorted in the White
Paper.
This time, President Obama's advisers are
open to
the Chinese Communist Party shows
good,
ready to Communist China to take over
entirely
to the issue of China's human rights.
Why the
CCP did not point to react? This will
not be
because once reciprocity, will inevitably
involve
the key to a major turning point of the
Sino-US
strategic dialogue on human rights
issues,
is because the school questioned headed
by Mr.
Gu Xiaojun Chen blind, Ai Weiwei and
other
revelations of human rights liar? A few
months
ago, China and the United States
government
does not just Chen blind human
rights
issues reached a secret agreement?
CPC silent, of course, is do not want to to Mr.
Gu
Xiaojun dip at any point "light". Moreover,
the big
credit, but also entirely due to Mr. Gu
Xiaojun
led school questioned. Ordinarily, the
CCP's
angry can not be regarded as
unreasonable,
that Chen blind, but it took more
than 60
million (Chen Guangcheng own
statement)
before the culture of an "anti-system"
U.S.
pawn!
CCP why not a bright point of view the
problem
then? As the inventor of that insane
fortune
conversion theory "Sevon said: Although
a value
of 60 million pawn waste. If so let the
U.S.
government to change its mind, and will no
longer
take the issue of human rights to
blackmail
the Chinese Communists. Chinese
Communists
do this to save the number
60000000
ah! CCP not been opposed by others to
interfere
in the internal affairs of this? How
people
do not want to interfere. Communist
China
does not yet meet it?
How absurd the Central Propaganda
Department
ah! Ignoring the fact that learning
to
uphold the constitution dignity, continues to
distort
the "lip States" as the most powerful
weapon
of the new round of network blocked. Mr.
Gu
Xiaojun thinking can talk about it? Empty
talk,
can restore CPC virtually countless loss of 60
million?
This does not, then overhead Chen
blind
man who 60,000,000 inherently
Propaganda
Department of the shares in which
it?
[Shi
Sansheng Saturday, December 15, 2012, 03:43 China]
line-h8 � t ? ��� or: rgb(73, 73, 73); font-family: simsun; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: rgb(170, 170, 170); "> Department ah! Ignoring the fact that learning
to uphold the constitution dignity, continues to
distort the "lip States" as the most powerful
weapon of the new round of network blocked. Mr.
Gu Xiaojun thinking can talk about it? Empty
talk, can restore CPC virtually countless loss of 60
million? This does not, then overhead Chen
blind man who 60,000,000 inherently
Propaganda Department of the shares in which
it?
[Shi Sansheng Saturday, December 15, 2012, 03:43 China]
没有评论:
发表评论