Nobel Prize without the open conspiracy Times and more underhand

Nobel Prize without the open conspiracy Times and more underhand

“China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group” Shi Sansheng Kyushu

Comments • The one hundred seventy-eight

Translator: God has eyes

Fight lasting two hours this morning, with

Google chrome, only made an overseas blog

article in English, fan turn mad, and the hard

disk light Changming. Worried about my old

notebook to an attack and had to turn off the

computer. Re-open, also like at the child, so still

it seems that you can hear your own heartbeat.

Only stare at my stalker, this is clearly not the

Central Propaganda Department of the style. But

only wholeheartedly recommended to Time

magazine, Mr. Gu Xiaojun, because no clear

answer to the Person of the Year candidate list

(open all the time), and you can not give up.

Hard on my browser, in addition to the Times,

but also who is it?

Needless to say, with learning general secretary

to “emancipate the mind”, to complete the

national revival Albert, to uphold the

constitution dignity, to ensure the

implementation of the constitution of the duties

of any organization or individual are not above

the Constitution and the law of privilege.

Everything violation of the Constitution and the

law must be investigated. “old school rogue only

riotings, the occluder people the freedom of

speech of the Central Propaganda Department,

has been impossible to follow his steps. Then

again, the the subjective ideology Li Changchun

adults, also Resurrection turn to the life, “is no

longer the party and state leaders not. In its

place, the interest of his. Is an opposition

elderly continue guiding ideology of the Central

Propaganda Department?

Apart from the Central Propaganda Department,

not only the “Times” the American devils are

also anti-intellectual, anti-civilization, anti-

justice Shisan Sheng Gu dough hated you?

Time magazine once again advise a: multi-line

unjust is doomed to destruction. Repentance

now, not yet too late. I did not refuse to see

foreign policy included the fate of Mr. Gu

Xiaojun? Not to mention a mere “foreign policy”,

that the Nobel Peace Prize, the Literature Prize

and how?

After in the Mo Yan swoop Sweden country, many

in and outside the media seem to have hit a

strong shot in the arm, re-flooding many days

from the dare “Mo Yan winning the topic of

speculation. Poor that dippy King of Sweden, also

had to play dumb, ignoring the strong doubts

School “questioned, given to honor this

untrustworthy, insincere vice chairman of the

Chinese Writers Association.

Including the Nobel literature jury before, the

incumbent Chairman and Mayueran installed

grandson, both dare respond Mo Yan why

winning? They dare not refute Shandong cultural

cadres bribery rumor. Sufficient to prove that the

Swedish Academy was justice defeated the first

values “​​challenged school! Not only the Swedish

Academy was beaten gray head gray face. Even

Mo Yan had to pretend to “oranges” will

recommend Mr. Gu Xiaojun to winning as a

bargaining chip to question the school “sign of

weakness, to curry favor with the.

The “in Mo Yan winning” reflections, called:

“storyteller”, and “storytelling won the Nobel

Prize for Literature proud. He added: “I’m after

winning a lot of wonderful stories, these stories,

I firmly believe that truth and justice, there is.”

“Storytelling” to replace the “novel” is clearly

absurd. Mr. Gu Xiaojun “Goran Malmqvist is a

novel idiot”, has said quite understand. Only

from the literal meaning of the novel

“storytelling”; but the story never can say

“fiction”. For example, Mr. Gu Xiaojun novel

“fate” by an old man “story” about the fate of

the Chinese people of an era. Lack of acting that

does not mean the end, “said Gary’s” an old

man “story” about a novel era of Chinese people.

Can we do that? Everyone has a story, can;

everyone has the novel can also be? Goran

Malmqvist really is a novel of idiot, the Swedish

Academy really is a bunch of novels idiot.

Mo Yan is not only equivalent to the “story” in

the novel as crazy, even at the cost of borrowing

the Nobel literature platform idiot fallacy, spread

to the world, it is the people of insight Xiaodiao

Daya!

Mo Yan insights idiot, doomed his “storytelling”

is a liar, no philosophy at all. For example, in his

speech, one side says “My mother is not literate,

but very respected illiterate people.” Side but

for unknown reasons, said their own primary

schools are not graduating “dropout sucker

interpreted as the Cultural Revolution caused

but unexpectedly Mo Yan also said “When I

reach for cattle and sheep passing from the front

of the school, see old classmates fooling around

campus, my heart is full of sadness, deeply

appreciate a person, even a child, leave groups

after painful. ‘

In order to render the greatness of his mother,

Mo Yan even describe her, said: “My child, do

not worry, even though I live a little fun, but

Yan Wangye not call me, I will not go.” With

parents born world mother, especially the

mother of the Chinese people, even depending

on their minor son are suffering, not entirely

“fun”? Mo Yan with his mother, contrary to

repeat itself and humanity also!

Mo Yan’s hypocrisy, and far more than that.

News and other brain-dead media shoved

holding smelly feet “to Mo Yan Nobel speech:

memory mother Mo Yan psychological dark youth,

it has been quite superior a more visible for the

beginning of the three the philosophical story

ending”.

Mo Yan’s first story, only those sucker talents

can read philosophy to never really crying. Sure

enough, he was moved to tears, and certainly in

no mood to observe whether others even cry fake

tears. To see the exhibition, see only the

exhibits or someone else’s back, sneaky

(childhood, perhaps with naughty), who has a

the spies general psychological only nationals

own fake cry when peeping performance .

The second story, but is a reflection of the

people and dogs in general conditions. How can

there be any philosophy at all?

The third story, but would like to ridicule people

who questioned him after his award-winning.

Sure enough, he is also one to believe that

“truth and justice exist” would not be afraid of

questioning, not posing as “oranges” to Mr. Gu

Xiaojun lightly re-promise.

See the outside of the Internet, someone said,

“the Nobel Prize is open conspiracy”, which is

really too much residual brain. Concept of the

Nobel, exactly which one civilization and

progress of human society, triggered because of

the Nobel Prize. Is there? Is not there?

I’m afraid the progress is difficult to seek a

trace. Credit for anti-civilization, touches as the

Nobel Peace Prize in 2012, the Literature Prize,

the foreign policy of the top100 thinkers Times

annual candidate objects together forever in

history. Was later cast aside, criticized!

[Shi Sansheng Sunday, December 9, 2012 09:49 China]