Recommended Gu Xiaojun to the Nobel Peace Prize, why is it so hard?

Recommended Gu Xiaojun to the Nobel Peace Prize, why is it so hard? 

"China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group" Shi Sansheng Kyushu

Comments • two hundred sixty-eight

Translator: God has eyes 

China's current social situation is so strange:

you want to escape the whirlpool of political,

politics has chosen to glue you! Rejection are

thrown out. Although her party hard dragged

into politics, and was ordered to the secret

police of the Central Propaganda Department the

Jasmine Revolution suspects in the trial, the

record. CCP advanced spy --- Australians Heng

Yang classified as a handful of people to engage

in political. But their so-called political really

could not get interested! Shi Sansheng I started

from October last year, even the commentary are

too lazy to write, just obsessed with Gu dough

together to the United States "foreign policy",

the "Times", recommended to the Nobel Peace

Prize judges, etc. Mr. Gu Xiaojun, recommended

Mr. Gu Xiaojun "the public impartiality first"

universal values. It did not cost the state half a

penny, entirely at their own expense (and not

only did not cost the state money, hand,

Communist China's state-owned Unicom earned

go a number of hard-earned money in exchange

Internet traffic).

Than cost billions of flesh and blood, fart

modern thinking of launching a campaign to

recommend to the Western world are not

Confucius, wasted taxpayer money is not said

often angered people blowing against common

enemies of the Western world sound. To be

ashamed if: compared with CCP insane, Shi

Sansheng my feel this recommended Mr. Gu

Xiaojun behavior is very noble. But thousands of

years, China's first folk spontaneous thoughts

advanced to the Western world output ah!

World to see: the the Shisan Sheng Gu dough I

recommend to the Western world Mr. Gu Xiaojun

or revealed to the Western world of Chen

Guangcheng the rights scam, exposing the

Pakistani activist girl malala (Malala Yousafzai)

to the great United Nations Secretary-General,

Mr. Ban Ki worth mentioning , called the

sentence is justified, and the United Nations set

up so that even the girl a liar "in malala (Malala

Yousafzai) Day will just have to blindly silence.

"Foreign Policy", "Times", "the world we have to

look at the face to act" can see: these world-

renowned media has always been a self-

righteous but also all chosen with eyes ceremony

--- silent attention to express Chinese civilians

first recommended to the Western world "the

public impartiality first" universal values,

recommended Mr. Gu Xiaojun support of the

great thinker.

Of course, the Western world has chosen silence

of reasons, the most important thing is ---- Mr.

Gu Xiaojun as the core of the idea "of ​​the public

impartiality" occupy the forefront of today's

human society, ideology. Anti Mr. Gu Xiaojun

thought, no doubt, in the anti-"justice", the

Western world, of course not stoop to the point

of anti-intellectualism, anti-civilization.

The first to recommend Mr. Gu Xiaojun thinking

of the Western world "the public impartiality

guilty? The others Western world by default, the

Chinese Communists ye also I like What the

behalf of the Western world to ban it. This is not

on their own initiative to stand the anti-

intellectual, anti-civilization side?

Revealed to the Western world rights liar Chen

Guangcheng, Ai Weiwei guilty? The people on

the United Nations website was surprised to

specify the word "Fraud Alert". We reveal a big

hoax the Pakistani activist girl malala (Malala

Yousafzai), to avoid Mr. Ban Ki-moon lost more

face in front of people all over the world

Xiabulaitai, United Nations thank all too late.

Communist China so can not wait to jump out is

to seal Mr. Gu Xiaojun blog is blocked to the

Nobel Peace Prize judges recommended in the

end for what?

Obviously, all the human rights activists Chen

Guangcheng, Ai Weiwei is a hoax; the Pakistani

girl malala (Malala Yousafzai) is a super-

swindler. The Chinese Communists so

Bushihaodai, good and evil, regardless ban

people uncover fraud, this is not the Chinese

Communist Party took the initiative to their own

homing to the ranks of the liar you?

Actions speak louder than words. CCP not only

spare no effort to safeguard these rights crooks

also speculation Pu Zhiqiang no substance called

Report "Tiger King" to the Nobel Peace Prize to

interfere with our recommended Mr. Gu Xiaojun.

Mr. Gu Xiaojun repeatedly blocked for several

years, it is sufficient to prove the CCP did not

care that they are standing anti the public

impartiality side of.

From communist seal kill Mr. Gu Xiaojun's "Down

with Lu Xun began to seal kill him the" expose

the Chinese Communists packing Ao "," mad very

Deng "," Ting Tong steel workers "expose Han",

"On the opposition, the opposition", Deng

Theory, presided over political reform controversy

"the" lifting fifty cents, grasping spy. " And

before 2011, Mr. Gu Xiaojun been banned

Communist China up to nine.

Only in the past in 2012, only one year, the CCP

launched three times the big crush on Mr. Gu

Xiaojun: promoting thin broke the news "event",

Mr. Gu Bo Associated Press ten thousands click

blog was blocked; summer CPC is trying to

manufacture is still serving means "the Gu

dough 8.30 political big injustice"; fall, because

of the 18 largest and the Diaoyu Islands? Mr. Gu

Xiaojun blog (second generation) nearly five

million clicks blog was blocked.

2013 has just begun, the traditional Chinese

New Year festive yet dispersed CPC once again

can not wait to lift the black hand, Mr. Gu

Xiaojun N generation Sina, Tianya blog's blog

full ban.

World, ah, we have come to the 'comments:

Spontaneously to the Western world to the Nobel

Peace Prize judges recommended by the famous

Chinese writer, a great thinker Mr. Gu Xiaojun

What is wrong? Why the CCP at the risk in

cahoots with the crook unwarranted interference,

obstruction, destruction?

Mr. Gu Xiaojun the advanced idea what "the

public impartiality" is wrong? Why the CCP

risked station to the anti-intellectual, anti-

civilization risk this even the United Nations, the

United States' foreign policy and the "Times"

ruthless default universal values?

Also the wisdom of the Nobel Peace Prize judges

to preside over the public impartiality it: If you

think "the public impartiality" is a universal

value, will promote the human world countries

and peoples, such as advanced concept of

peaceful coexistence. Please have the great

reputation of the Nobel generalized to the whole

world!

Mr. Gu Xiaojun, were bent on blocking the

judges of the Nobel Peace Prize will also meet

with the Chinese communists against the

common enemy? Even if the end of the world

ever come, I will not believe it!

[Shi Sansheng Friday, February 22, 2013 08:01 china · Weifang]