2013年2月2日星期六

To Nobel Peace Prize jury recommended "the public impartiality first"


To Nobel Peace Prize jury recommended "the public impartiality first"
"China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group" Shi Sansheng Kyushu Comments • two hundred fifty-two
Translator: God has eyes
By the famous Chinese writer, a great thinker in
the field of human sociology today, Mr. Gu
Xiaojun first "the public impartiality, may be the
most timely, is also close to a perfect theory.
Mr. Gu Xiaojun broad and deep thought,
because of Communist China's unremitting
blocked, naturally have a lot of "the opposition".
Hit Lu Xun "," expose and criticize Han "," Deng
Xiaoping Thought critical ", the" Three
Represents is nonsense, swindling "wait and see,
invariably attract many duty-bound, scolded the
Gu, down caregivers. Opponents even expose
and criticize Han, broke the news that Wang
Lijun and pour Bo, also caused great panic and
resort to the threat of death.
Have so many "the natural opponents Gu
Xiaojun doctrine, when the advent of" the public
impartiality first opposition even disappeared
without a trace, not only did not publicly oppose
"the public impartiality", and even the Chinese
Communist Party Mr. Wen Jiabao, the number
two man, not afraid to back suspected plagiarism
everywhere to promote "fairness and justice" and
of "the public impartiality" aired.
Mr. Wen Jiabao everywhere to promote not only
to promote "the public impartiality is the first
values, and even the world-renowned American
foreign policy", the "Times" received the
enthusiastic recommendation of Gu dough also
let Yasheng come forward to "how to bring
democracy to China," said Chen Guangcheng and
his ilk influence is minimal, "the public
impartiality the first to respond with evidence
really great.
"The public impartiality first" Why is it so
irresistible? Mr. Gu Xiaojun thought, to find the
root cause of today's human society poles ----
Western and socialist ideology. Socialist China,
have played with the killing of children by the
injustices of anger to vent; model of democracy
in the United States, have one out gunned down
students tragedy. Even socialist China is an
exemplary democracy, are afraid to admit that
injustice is the root cause of the tragedy that
cause. These modern society, "the public
impartiality first soil.
So, my natural duty-bound to the Nobel Peace
Prize judges recommended.
Because in Connaught judges nominated
activities deadline --- February 1 has not been in
the past, I actually see online have burst out,
"the Bavi rights girl had been nominated as a
candidate for the Nobel Peace Prize". This is
obviously a trample the event of the public
impartiality. I know that the Western world
despised authoritarian societies, and to be
proud of is to pay attention to procedural
justice. However, the Nobel Peace Prize selection
rules, since the provisions of the nomination of
the 50-year confidentiality period, no matter
what, how can disclose their nominee, and
trumpeted momentum it?
I personally recommend noble Nobel Peace Prize
judges, arbitration does not comply with the
procedural justice nominees the Bavi rights girl
"and their nomination," Pakistan's human rights
the girls malala "out, in order to maintain the
Nobel Peace Prize sacred and dignity . To seal
kill Mr. Gu Xiaojun, the CCP's ideology and the
Politics and Law Committee and its they
respected the so-called knowledge elite who took
pains to contact the Western elite scum, partner
blocked Guxiao Jun Mr. have is an indisputable
fact, may be from the "Foreign Policy" sneaky To
get an idea theof ​​ selection and announcement
of 2012 one hundred global thinkers "clues.
Therefore, I like an ordinary lawyer the pleading
the supreme of Justice - Nobel Peace Prize
judges, the public impartiality time! Borrow you
have a great reputation, Mr. Gu Xiaojun great
the public impartiality first "into the world, into
modern life (only the soul of that the time times
killing of schoolchildren event dead children, is
also worth also should do it)! Thanks for the
peace of the Lord Chancellor of human society -
Nobel Peace Prize judges! Thank you to read my
recommendations and suggestions!
[Shi Sansheng Saturday, February 2, 2013 4:21 china]

没有评论:

发表评论

成都旋风鸣学不是骗子是什么?

《中国网络民评官百人团》石三生 九州评论·之一千一百三十八 不得不说,百度真的很厉害,数日间,就将骗子何俊成所在的成都旋风鸣学洗了个干干净净。搜狐网就更是卖力,一连串的新闻发出来,让人眼花缭乱,想不迷失都很困难。 好在,尽管是在第二页,但也有网友向黑猫投诉,要求成都旋风鸣...