To the Nobel Peace Prize jury recommended uphold rights pioneer Gu Xiaojun

To the Nobel Peace Prize jury recommended uphold rights pioneer Gu Xiaojun

"China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group" Shi Sansheng Kyushu

Comments • two hundred sixty-six

Translator: God has eyes 

Dear Nobel Peace Prize Jury:

In an article in the "Nobel Peace Prize judges

concerned about the rights scam", I give you a

Pakistani girl Malala Yousafzai rights scam.

Pointed to China from Malala Yousafzai Chen

Guangcheng's rights cases in a series of foreign

investment driven, or the rights of a handful of

people, almost all of scam.

Made on the result of the sex trade as Western

"Miss" to China, with an insulting word children:

"rights" that are mainly from the United States

"universal value" also acclimatized in China, and

the evolved into a scam. The reason, as Mr. Gu

Xiaojun said "rights daringly business":

"Human rights issues raised and resolved in a

democratic society, the case, along with analog,

affect others in other words: the cases of human

rights, universal or universal significance.

Authoritarian state of human rights cases, is not

universal - law with a law, the execution is

different, the results will be quite different,

such as rape, which is a common problem of the

individual class society it?, can be interpreted as

a "temporary rape" in China, "Daitao not rape"

girl sex "and so on."

In other words, Mr. Gu Xiaojun revealed that the

American defenders business can not be the

root cause of the global promotion, or from

differences in social systems: American rights

cases because the case law, it has a universal

significance; China, Russia, the implementation

of the Statute Law national rights cases can only

be the case affect the legal cases may be

minimal. This is Lyudmila decades holding

American money, American rights to sell in

Russia and in response to those same reasons;

complete failure also Chen Guangcheng holding

American money in China to sell U.S. rights .

Dear Nobel Peace Prize judges, perhaps I should

not say such as the rights of Chen Guangcheng

and his ilk is a complete failure, because he has

succeeded not only in violation of the policy of

the Chinese government able to bounce back,

enjoy his rights to no avail Linyi as well as the

vast majority of Chinese people dare not expect

---- family to the U.S., and lived a happy-go-lucky

democratic life.

Dear Nobel Peace Prize judges, needless to say

--- rights only in safeguarding the rights and

interests of the vast majority of people, makes

sense to promote social progress of human rights

and democracy. People really standing aside for

the sake of the people, for the people rights,

look at the world today, only Mr. Gu Xiaojun.

Mr. Gu Xiaojun is the world's most important

matter: First, because China accounts for a fifth

of the world's population, for the majority of the

Chinese people to protect their rights naturally

nobody can match; Second, because the world

only remnants of a small number of authoritarian

state, Mr. Gu Xiaojun activist career occupies a

geographical advantage; democracy has been

implemented in most countries around the

world, but the defenders of the democratic

countries do not have universal significance of

the authoritarian state.

Therefore, Mr. Gu Xiaojun behalf of the rights of

the vast majority of people in China can be

described as the best weather, terrain, and the

advantages. It is true that only the upper hand

is not enough, but also the actual action and

contribution.

Dear Nobel Peace Prize jury, Mr. Gu Xiaojun

rights of the enormous contribution of the

Chinese community, do not say laid bare "a

mortal scam" grasping spies, exposing the huge

role of pseudo-democratic inspire people

thought; does not say "Down with Lu Xun ,

"Deng Xiaoping ideological criticism" and "Three

Represents located crap, swindling" lashed out

on the vested interests of the Chinese

Communist Party. Only Guxiao Jun from the

"Comments" political game "article" to change

China more than three thousand articles,

contributed to the Chinese Communist Party

eighteen after nine change, Mr. "and" Ideology

and the Politics and Law Committee downgrade "

, only this one is unique in the world.

"Ideological downgrade ---- CPC unconstitutional

suppression of free speech Blackhand is

convergence. People will have more right to

speak; Politics and Law Committee downgrade

"---- shady will gradually transparent judicial

manipulated by the Chinese Communists. As

government-hired the petitioners staff is

sentenced thousands of petitioners will no

longer legitimate behavior and the tragic abuse

of the Chinese communist government grab of

false imprisonment.

Respected Nobel peace prize judges, while Mr.

Gu Xiaojun is that Chinese society has made

tremendous contributions to "the public

impartiality" values if​​ its first promotion in the

world, I believe that also the progress of human

society as a whole make a greater contribution

to:

With "the public impartiality" does not occur a

series of Tu Tong case; case shot dead

schoolchildren will not happen in the United

States.

With "the public impartiality, to Chen

Guangcheng do not have installed blind for

their own rights; Malala Yousafzai also do not

have to fake Taliban shootings.

With "the public impartiality, and North Korea do

not have to use nuclear explosions to threaten

the world; United Nations will be deceived and

revoke" Malala Yousafzai day.

With "the public impartiality first countries to

get along will be more friendly, and the United

States do not have to retake the original is not

universal" rights "cases extortion CCP's orders.

Respected Nobel Peace Prize judges, the public

impartiality "benefits can be said for me, but

there is no doubt that, with" the public

impartiality, at least the Norwegian Parliament

does not nominate a liar do promise Nobel Peace

Prize candidate.

Early this morning, Mr. Gu Xiaojun published

"the public impartiality", described "the power of

the public impartiality and freedom, different, or

is the difference: if a person has committed a

crime, in accorShice with the legal provisions,

the judicial authorities temporarily or

permanently deprived of the freedom of the

person. course, no matter who, sin how much are

not any agency or person can deprive any

person or group requirements and enjoy the

public impartiality powers ". Mr. Gu Xiaojun

thinking in these areas, really is dizzying, the

Nobel Peace Prize judges look at it!

Dear Nobel Peace Prize judges, I again would

recommend to you Mr. Gu Xiaojun famous

Chinese writer, thinker, and will always

recommend him! Until there is a person with

real materials prove themselves whether it is in

their thoughts and behavior are far beyond Mr.

Gu Xiaojun. Also to urge judges Huiyanshizhu ---

Before no one can surpass Mr. Gu Xiaojun, the

Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to Mr. Gu Xiaojun!

[Shi Sansheng Sunday, February 17, 2013 7:22 china]