Asked Foreign Policy:
Do you really care about the fate of the Chinese people?
Asked Foreign Policy:
Do you really care about the fate of the Chinese people?
"China
Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group" Shi Sansheng
Kyushu comment · 135
Translator:God has
eyes
Despite the
announcement from the "Foreign
Policy" year
2012 "one hundred global thinkers"
list for some time.
But I Shisan Sheng has can
be concluded that:
"Foreign Policy" in this year's
top 100 "Gu
Xiaojun three words. People in the
People's Liberation
Army "who also hopes
downright become some
two hundred and fifty.
Which, of course,
including the Korean powder,
blind powder, guarana
powder, and Liu
invincible followers.
Read Mr. Gu Xiaojun "human meat
pie" thinking:
Or, the American people are kind,
but also really
willing to help the Chinese
people, as when silly
childhood determined to
"save the
American people living in dire straits
"General.
Otherwise, how would there be so
many of the Flying
Tigers, 14th Air team
members sacrificed
their precious lives? However,
if the causes of
World War II, really, as Mr. Gu
Xiaojun said:
"World War II" does these silly Pitt
forced out "of
the results, the goodness of the
American people, is
it also became a victim of
the U.S. elite who?
The elites of the democratic
world, even this
bring disaster to the tragedy of
mankind as a whole
can be manufactured. Said
they worried about
the fate of the Chinese
people alone would
not become a joke? Free
world the essence of
interests "(see Gu Xiaojun
doctrine), Americans
over the past century side
are concerned about
China, but he has also
seemingly misread,
misjudge China behind,
whether just for
their own interests? Otherwise,
why in the strong
intervention of the American
Empire nearly a
century, democracy, freedom, not
only must not also a
trial of strength to
complicate the
matter, it did not do? Sun Yat-
sen support it?
Stilwell sympathy for the Chinese
Communists do? U.S.
support of Liu invincible?
A master of myth
manufactured by the U.S.
government? The blind
Chen in the end is not a
U.S. informant? Why
the U.S. government is so
good to him? Chen,
the blind are not blind, Do
Americans are blind?
If Han, Ai Weiwei and his
ilk, this is what /
dog / fart / thinker? The world
famous "foreign
policy" keen on such a miserable
fools who caused God.
Purpose with the Chinese
Communists, in order
to fool the Chinese
people? Idiot is
Chinese thinkers. The people
there are what count
on? Why the wise men of
the free world will
only see the Chinese
civilization refuse?
American people really will
"Grass Mud
Horse" talks about even included
into the textbooks to
support Ai Weiwei great
idea? The United
States love swearing, indecent
If that is the case,
why not direct "Grass Mud
Horse" instead
of "hello"? Americans lack of
acting, nor will the
chief culprit of the subprime
mortgage crisis, and
condemned to the
colonialists head of
the British Empire? What
you can not. Why will
agree with Ai Weiwei
blame social problems
in China thousands of
years ago, Confucius
and Mencius head so
preposterous
"thinking" it?
Why? In the end is
why? The wise men of the
free world do not
want to see the real problem
of the Chinese
civilization --- "Gu Xiaojun 'such a
brilliant idea? In
the economy: the Spring
Festival in 2008
predicted that the Chinese stock
market without
disaster fell continue ", hundreds
of foreign policy
thinkers have thought? Politics:
China Council
eventually, as he predicted (latest
forecast is Mr. Gu
own ban) is not bad. Only 9
change 7 thesis of
the world few can? Its
ideological: the
macro as "fair values" proposed
to explain why the
Western capitalist elite
democratic society
stagnating, stop the root
causes of the
evolution. Microscopic put forward,
such as "a
mortal scam" profoundly revealed the
the current FY
upheaval of Chinese society
intrinsic motivation.
Does foreign policy: either
macro or micro, your
global TOP 100 thinkers may
have such a
character? Perhaps Shi Sansheng
my ignorance,
rummaged through the Chinese
media at home and
abroad, we have not got
more than Mr. Gu
Xiaojun thinkers. If foreign
policy to its
referral to China; If not, ask you to
Gu Xiaojun doctrine
introduced to the world.
Okay? Only in this
way. In order to prove that
the foreign policy is
really concerned about
China, concerned
about the fate of the Chinese
people. Otherwise, it
can only be reduced to
some garbage elite
liar childcare.
[Shi Sansheng Friday,
November 2, 2012 7:01 China]
没有评论:
发表评论