2012年11月4日星期日

Asked Foreign Policy: Who dares to guide 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China?


Asked Foreign Policy: Who dares to guide 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China?

"China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group" Shi Sansheng Kyushu Comments · one hundred thirty-eight

Translator:God has eyes

 [before:( all ladders
complete collapse. This seems to have confirmed
the speculation century of major --- maintenance
of stability and political and religious disputes
mystery: drywall, and take the ladder, in fact, is
a group of people. 】 Foreign Policy can not seize
the last opportunity, "Gu Xiaojun," and included
into the "TOP 100 Global Thinkers", the Chinese
Communists eighteen, estimated the world's
mainstream media is necessary annihilated.
Because the face of three years have seen such a
change in the situation, not even a thinker to
the pulse of the quasi-Communist China. Really
the case, TOP100 I am afraid it had become a
staple of jokes the world. Is not it? Tonight, the
year two thousand and one on November 3, 2003,
Mr. Gu Xiaojun Sina retransmission in May this
year after about eighteen Old Man (survival less
than one hour). Old Man new hair, the original
is not surprising. Odd, in this series of articles,
proprietary article entitled "to the eighteen
provides several guiding ideology". Foreign Policy
of insight, presumably would not understand the
great significance of the "guiding ideology"
implies, right? Not to mention that TOP100
which thinkers dare to be so confident. Only fear
with confidence and may not dare presumptuous
it? Even if you dare confident, dare to be
presumptuous, and I'm afraid that idiot stomach
did not have even a drop of sesame oil. On the
other let alone this one Mr. "to eighteen
provides several guiding ideology, enough to be
ranked TOP100, but also is Number one, only Gu
Xiaojun. Is not so? Following Together we
appreciate Mr. Gu Xiaojun "guiding ideology":
"guiding ideology, First," learning theory "that
Communist China should" learn impartiality. Mr. Gu
Xiaojun, learning democracy --- the interests of
impartiality to talk; political , to talk about
democracy. "Needless to say, the proliferation of
these years of Chinese society groups event,
black fight blood levy, demolitions, self-
immolation, the miscarriage of impartiality and
repeatedly made major life and limb, the root
cause is the government missing in the interests
of impartiality led to the CPC leaders really speak
impartiality, democracy, and will be a blessing for the
Chinese people. Conversely, Mo Yan and his ilk
have followed suit, learning what "speech" in the
Yan'an Forum on Literature, repeat the speech,
all the mistakes, who can guarantee that Premier
Wen Jiabao worried Cultural Revolution dying
embers resurgence it? guiding ideology of the
"theory of the cake". Mr. Gu Xiaojun think it
should be "learning by doing, Oiwake - both to
do a big cake, more divided cake. Points good
cake, about impartiality; big cake. About
development. The "defection in Wang Lijun, thin
valley open to Bo Xilai and other have been
brought to impartiality after the reform open first
Minjin the country retreat, and now into the
people back into the country, wealthy and poor,"
has become a well-known fact. Thin Hee the
guiding ideology of the "first division good cake,
do a big cake" with the ocean's "first big cake,
and then divided into good cake" dispute, in
addition to prove the correctness of the theory of
Mr. Gu Xiaojun has no other significance.
response mechanism. Mr. Gu Xiaojun "take the
initiative to respond to, is the best means to
eliminate the" rumors ". "The prevalence of
these years rumors of Chinese society, natural
design has a great relationship with the CCP's"
response mechanisms "and the response
mechanism of natural defects, naturally do not
speak just the inevitable result. Lady this when
the head of the to prospective First Lady of the
statue, since nothing to fear from public
activities under the eye, why not go further,
openly respond questioned it? "active response"
of course is the best means of destroying the
rumors are not subject to attention Do not
"respond" inflicted "active sophistry" initiative,
such as the Swedish Academy's Nobel Prize for
Literature before the jury, the incumbent
President, and Goran Malmqvist side
disinformation side rumor "active response" will
be the opposite , the more the provision of more
rumors. guiding ideology Fourth, the
"maintenance of stability theory. Mr. Gu Xiaojun"
If people with the police immediately to deal
with local leading cadres hold - you do not have
the ability to resolve contradictions, but aroused
public resentment, I To what are you doing?
Deal with you, is to let people vent, look to other
officials. Vacated position, to train a new
generation. "This one, Mr. Gu has
interpretations too careful, why should Shi
Sansheng blab it again. Communist China as
true to say impartiality, estimated that China's social
group events plummeted more than 90% The
guiding ideology five is the role of the party
members. Mr. Gu Xiaojun that suffer first, enjoy
later; into conflict with the masses, disputes of
interest, you should be courteous. Can not, you
quit the party. "Mr. Gu This theory is" the root
of all evil, "the moral standards of the feudal
society officials to ask vowed to" serve the
people "communists even this can not, depends
on how the nerve in the party? How kind?
Foreign Policy, you do not also organize your
TOP100 to Communist China to offer advice?'m
afraid Han Ai Weiwei addition to flatter, it will
only show oneself, right?
[Shi Sansheng
Saturday, November 3, 2012, 23: 07 Chinese]

没有评论:

发表评论

成都旋风鸣学不是骗子是什么?

《中国网络民评官百人团》石三生 九州评论·之一千一百三十八 不得不说,百度真的很厉害,数日间,就将骗子何俊成所在的成都旋风鸣学洗了个干干净净。搜狐网就更是卖力,一连串的新闻发出来,让人眼花缭乱,想不迷失都很困难。 好在,尽管是在第二页,但也有网友向黑猫投诉,要求成都旋风鸣...