To thank U.S. Foreign
Policy closer to impartiality
"China
Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group "Shi Sansheng
Kyushu comment · one hundred sixty-one
Translator: God has
eyes
See the
multi-dimensional foreign policy: how to
bring democratic
China "did not pay particular
attention to of
Yasheng its people. Even in
subsequent foreign
policy why should abandon
Chen Guangcheng,
"paranoid conspiracy of
Americans may exist.
After some
understanding of the author,
although not clear
all their doubts. But on
foreign policy at
this time the intention of this
article, a positive
view of a sharp increase in
many. Of course, Mr.
Huang Yasheng further: or
directly expose the
true face of Chen
Guangcheng; found
that the most important
force in China's
democratic factions ---- Gu
Xiaojun doctrine or
the same as Mr. Lei Da. The
foreign policy of
"fair view" abunShitly clear
also!
Originally, this
author really is not mortal, but
authentic Maoist
descenShit --- had been Mao
Zedong "Hunan
Hesen Hubei Huang negative
raw" yellow
Negative Health grandson, "airwaves"
never disappear of
Huang Gang's son, and Ai
Weiwei with Yasheng
Huang went to the
American Empire in
1981 studies. , Baidu
Encyclopedia, 2010
edition of the South
"hundred the
Archduke known" biography, very
authentic. The
obviously red three generations of
Liuyang learning, it
seems as though the whole
people has always
been a "Chinese" in general.
Look at the Old Man,
Mr. Wong's knowing
economic theory, or
useful set is also very biased
people. My teacher
Mr. Gu Xiaojun unfortunately
not been coaching, a
cavity blood, it turned into
a Ukrainian --- spade
are white torn. Such as
Long as the dispute,
such as to a people money
initiatives, such as
the U.S. policy toward China
the Chinese people
disgusted.
Contrast Mr. Huang's
Old Man, "how to bring
democratic
China" argument is not unexpected,
in its conversations
with the Chinese people ",
has been created. Mr.
Wong rehash error, blame
his "nerd"
gas, if he really did not mean to play
the fool, then.
Chinese people talk or
recommendations to
the U.S. government to
adjust its China
policy or Mr. Huang's error,
failed to recognize
the nature of things ----
Washington's China
policy is a conspiracy.
Mr. Wong is a special
foreign policy writer's
identity, and very
conceited ---- think they are
well aware of China's
Harvard professor. Indulge
in empty talk
economic theory, and not a
speculation the
blind, Ai large stay noted that
the foreign policy of
the Times, the Han three
cheat absurd, it is
somewhat surprising. Do not
know it when Mr. Gu
Xiaojun Han questioned for
more than three
years, did not know Mr. Gu
Xiaojun more than a
year of Ai Weiwei
questioned. How you
can not know Mr. Gu
Xiaojun Chen
Guangcheng "fake" expose it? This
is alarmed Chinese
Vice Foreign Minister
personally visit
Gary's blog and message of the
big event! Even
foreign policy should, by the
mouth of the
congressmen, said Chen blind
"made
history" big event ah! Do not know how
the nerve to say that
they are understanding of
China's human
children?
Foreign policy and
its false Yasheng mouth of the
review of
Washington's China strategy. Why not
just review a long
fatuous Yasheng pass headed
diplomacy experts?
Mr. Wong well done article,
the why so has only
GeshanShiiu to the people
no benefit? Why
foreign policy to make its own
experts to look in
the sitting real no a scholar
with it? The
"failure" of Washington's China
strategy (the failure
of the Chinese people, but
it can not be denied
that the success of the
American people), to
what extent is dependent
on international
affairs publication "is
recognized as the
world's most influential
"influence?
Can it be said: the
failure of Washington and
the strategy of
China, that is judged that the
failure of the
foreign policy of China issues? This
failure, In addition
to was blinded (Yasheng this
expert, will be
blinded by it?), The missing
elements of the
foreign policy of their own
conscience? Foreign
policy will be a tax evasion
7,000,000 Ai stay
sought after as a thinker. Is
not advocate crime?
Of course, regardless
of how democracy to China,
"the starting
point is what? In this case, the
value published on
the occasion of the Chinese
Communist Party 18
big, I believe the real China
or benefit. Although
not laid bare the fake blind
the true face of Chen
blind, but able to
recognize the the
fakes role has been "minimal",
can be considered
slightly better than no
progress! But have to
point out is that the
foreign policy of
this article, in the progress of a
little while. And the
birth of a greater fallacy ----
Chinese political
elite certainly understand that
democracy provides
property and personal
safety. Both of the
foreign policy of the quasi-
criminals Ai stayed
hailed as thinkers, western
democratic countries
is still dominated by the
United States
Government to open the door, and
wantonly accepted
China's corrupt, the bare
Officer relatives.
All these are to instill the
concept of China's
political elite.
But China's political
elites are not fools, they
understand that the
United States and other
Western world can
help harboring stolen goods
ill-gotten gains, and
also natural understanding
of these ill-gotten
gains if they are in a
democratic country,
barely. Democratic countries,
and tolerance for
their crime, than Autocratic
countries and more
harsh. Whether Yasheng
example, the number
of Chinese Communist
Party leaders, Crown
Dali XingJu death penalty,
can not stop the
autocratic love of Chinese
political elites.
This point, the views of ordinary
people than the
Chinese foreign policy wise a
million times: the
net of impartiality, sparse and will
drain. Eighty million
troops, bad luck always just
a handful. The key is
to stand a good team, with
the right people.
Therefore, the
foreign policy of trying to explain
the benefits of
democracy, still howling at the
moon with the CCP's
political elites. Democracy
bad North Korea as
standard authoritarian
country would not
advertised himself as a
democratic country.
Let alone see the Chinese
political elite
knowledge and more widely.
Nevertheless, Shi
Sansheng still very grateful to
the reflection of the
foreign policy. Also grateful
to the foreign policy
insincerely bravely ants
step forward to
"impartiality". If Yasheng Huang, the
so-called China hand
is not blinders seen this
monster Gu Xiaojun
doctrine. Shi Sansheng my
thanks and gratitude,
and I'm afraid it will as
the surging Yangtze
River water, rushing is not
no way out.
On a small step
forward, Mr. Gu Xiaojun
included into the
TOP100 it! If foreign policy
really want to
promote democracy would come
soon to the magical
land.
[Shi Sansheng Sunday,
November 25, 2012 03:09 China]
没有评论:
发表评论