Foreign Policy already know shame TIME still obsessed

Foreign Policy already know shame TIME still obsessed

"China Network Public Evaluation of officials 18 hundred people group "Shi Sansheng Kyushu comment · one hundred Fifty-eight

Translator: God has eyes

Foreign Policy see Multidimensional a "foreign

policy: how to bring democracy to China",

understand that this is in the slope, prepare the

ass.

The article says: "The United States should

adopt a new way to influence China's future

political: to explain democracy will bring

concrete benefits, such as more balanced growth,

stability and personal security - even for senior

Communist party officials. Based arguments of

the results will be the recognition of the many

economic and intellectual elite, may have the

opportunity to influence the ideas of President Xi

Jinping and his staff. "

The article also said: "The Chinese people very

utilitarian concept of" rights "- they seek to

maximize the interests of the majority - Western

point of view of the rights of the latter think that

this is to protect the minority who lost

citizenship erosion even the most critical of

Beijing intellectuals also admit that the idea of

Chen​​ and other dissidents in China's 1.3 billion

can only get minimal response. "

The Times also learned in the previous point,

but unfortunately foreign policy, with help

Obama to identify a group of mounted blind fool

dead liar do voice. If I had to introduce

ourselves to listen to Mr. Gu Xiaojun Gu Xiaojun

doctrine is selected to do the think tank (see

"Chinese Obama"). Ho As for today understand

that the so-called universal values with​​ no

hanging hair? Now want to explain what

"democracy" in Communist China, late Sanqiu!

Chinese Communists really good deeds, like

political reform, Mr. Gu Xiaojun own local big

thinkers "populist democracy", "justice is the

first values" out of the box. Why should we take

your pants fart ---- abandoned German horse to

ride it to find an American donkey.

After that foreign policy is not so much what 1.3

billion Chinese people do not trust the dissident

Chen Guangcheng and his ilk do not respond.

Why not dare to openly admit that they know are

wrong, know no shame, know Chan blind ilk

really is no one with like garbage? Why not dare

admit Chen blind man and his ilk, was originally

a spokesperson of the Western world, the elites

of the Western countries for a bargaining chip

with the Chinese elite, is a democratic process to

establish the partnership repressor stumbling

block?

But lately, Chen blind fled to the United States

foreignEmbassy, ​​ policy also does not leave the

mouth of U.S. Congressman Frank Wolf, yelling

"went to the United States to stand up for its

ideals moment" it? Shit ideals of the United

States? Not that the "interests"! The foreign

policy dare Furthermore, laid bare the true face

of Chen Guangcheng fake blind?

Where is Chen Guangcheng minimal impact on

you! Mr. Gu Xiaojun first questioned, tell the

world the Chinese people already know that

Chen Guangcheng is a "fake", followed Piandao

Shou / dog / day / then the Nobel Peace Prize.

I'm afraid that influence is not negligible, right?

Of course, foreign policy shy, in the end is to say

the fact that Chen blind has become a rags. Stay

in the United States, and sooner or later a

bomb. Want to return to China, I'm afraid to be

prohibitively difficult! Shi Sansheng Masters

want me pointing you look at it?

Chinese people like Yang tattered. With a

German horse, is already within the shame of

not. A few years ago, Wu Bangguo adults on

straight said "not to engage in five", which

means that Western-style democracy, the CCP

has cover from the ears, and no longer listen to.

I do not want to hear, people have stuffed her

ears with donkey hair, you still think that the

interpretation of "democracy" with others, have

Alex use? This is clearly not want to fall on deaf

ears!

Now is that the United States if you want to also

hold "democratic" Fudge Chinese people, only to

start all over again. The fake not useful, why not

try to go fight it? Gu Xiaojun doctrine advocated

"justice is the first values" populist democracy,

has been the world's default. Even Communist

China are as if pierced brains have to Gu Xiaojun

'pain killer. So, foreign policy, why not

abandoned its own Western-style "democracy"

that change sub-Spear, attack sub Shield: with

TIME, Mr. Gu Xiaojun included into the TOP 100

TIME 100?

As Mr. Gu Gu Xiaojun political Minutes (b)

"said:" the most fundamental interests of the

American people, is the maintenance of

democratic institutions, and the promotion of

democratic institutions and the purpose of

promoting or maintaining this world as long as

there are shaped the same fascist militarism

system, at any time may appear war engulfed

the fruits of democracy. "so straightforward truth

presumably foreign policy with the Times is not

difficult to understand it? However, if the

"tantamount to fascist militarism system" nipped

in the bud, in addition to the promotion of

democracy, there are more effective means of?

Both Shashi Hou, and also thinking about talking

endlessly to "explain"! Fooled dozens of overload,

this made little actual action?

[Shi Sansheng Friday, November 23, 2012 5:37 China]

[Shi Sansheng Friday, November 23, 2012 5:37 China]